- Zannini v. Reliance Insurance Company
Reformation
147 Ill.2d 437, 590 N.E.2d 457, 168 Ill. Dec. 820 (1992)
Reformation allowed on basis of agent's negligence in failing to procure requested coverage.
- Zappia v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
Underinsured Motorist Coverage: Arbitration
364 Ill.App.3d 883, 847 N.E.2d 597, 301 Ill. Dec. 587 (1st dist. 5th div. 2006)
Arbitration award exceeding the specified threshold can be rejected.
- Zdeb v. Allstate Insurance Company
Uninsured Motorist Coverage: Setoff
404 Ill.App.3d 113, 935 N.E.2d 706, 343 Ill. Dec. 698 (1st dist. 6th div. 2010)
Insurance Company was permitted to offset amounts paid under medical payments coverage from the policy’s underinsured motorist coverage.
- Zegar v. Sears Roebuck & Company, et al.
Medical Payments Coverage: No Fault
211 Ill.App.3d 1025, 570 N.E.2d 1176, 156 Ill. Dec. 454 (1st dist. 4th div. 1991)
Owner's CGL policy which contained 'no fault' coverage for injured patron's medical expenses did not authorize patron's direct suit against owner's insurer.
- Zimmerman v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Company
Underinsured Motorist Coverage: Arbitration
317 Ill.App.3d 360, 739 N.E.2d 990, 251 Ill. Dec. 57 (2nd dist. 2000)
When unambiguous language of policy required arbitration of issue of “payment,” insurer must pay the full amount of the arbitration award without a setoff.
- Zubi v. Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company
Cancellation: Notice Of
323 Ill.App.3d 28, 751 N.E.2d 69, 256 Ill. Dec. 16 (1st dist. 1st div. 2001)
Insurer complied with terms of policy when it canceled insured’s policy.
- Zurich American Ins. Co. v. Ocwen Financial Corp.
Duty To Defend: Exclusions
990 F.3d 1073 (7th Cir. 2021)
Coverage for complaint alleging dozens of improper robocalls was barred by exclusions "arising out of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and certain other statutes."
- Zurich American Insurance Company v. Key Cartage, Inc.
Mandatory Insurance
386 Ill.App.3d 1, 896 N.E.2d 400, 324 Ill. Dec. 614 (1st dist. 3rd div. 2008)
As a matter of first impression, the court held that section 7-317(b)(2) of the Illinois Vehicle Code, requiring omnibus coverage, applies to insurance policies issued to commercial truckers. In addition, the court held that Zurich’s reciprocal coverage provision violated section 7-317(b)(2) and, therefore, was void as against Illinois public policy.
- Zurich American Insurance Company v. Key Cartage, Inc., et al.
Mandatory Insurance
236 Ill.2d 117, 923 N.E.2d 710, 337 Ill. Dec. 859 (2009)
The public policy expressed in the Proof of Financial Responsibility section of the Illinois Vehicle Code did not apply to, and therefore was not violated by, a reciprocal coverage provision in a commercial vehicle insurance policy.
- Zurich Insurance Company v. Amcast Industrial Corporation
Subrogation: In General
318 Ill.App.3d 330, 742 N.E.2d 337, 252 Ill. Dec. 87 (1st dist. 2nd div. 2000)
Automobile insurer’s subrogation for property damage is not barred by insured’s prior action for his personal injury and eyeglass damage.
