Log In

Complete List - Insurance Case Law Index

Found 2,202 results

  • University of Illinois v. Continental Casualty Company
    Duty To Defend: Civil Rights
    234 Ill.App.3d 340, 599 N.E.2d 1338, 175 Ill. Dec. 324 (4th dist. 1992) School board liability policy provides coverage for numerous civil rights claims.
  • University of Illinois v. Continental Casualty Company
    Late Notice: In General
    234 Ill.App.3d 340, 599 N.E.2d 1338, 175 Ill. Dec. 324 (4th dist. 1992) Insured obligated to provide reasonable notice even under indemnity only policy.
  • University of Illinois v. Continental Casualty Company
    Definitions: Bodily Injury
    234 Ill.App.3d 340, 599 N.E.2d 1338, 175 Ill. Dec. 324 (4th dist. 1992) Claim for mental anguish does not constitute bodily injury.
  • Urban v. Loham
    Guaranty Association: In General
    227 Ill.App.3d 772, 592 N.E.2d 292, 169 Ill. Dec. 805 (4th dist. 1992) Failure to collect UM benefits did not bar recovery against guaranty fund.
  • Valdovinos v. Gallant Insurance Company
    Bad Faith: Attorney Fees
    314 Ill.App.3d 1018, 733 N.E.2d 886, 248 Ill. Dec. 211 (2nd dist. 2000) Automobile insurer's failure to pay actual cost of repairs for damages sustained in accident is vexatious and unreasonable, thus warranting award of costs and attorney's fees.
  • Valley Forge Insurance Company v. Swiderski Electronics, Inc.
    Advertising Injury Liability Insurance
    359 Ill.App.3d 872, 834 N.E.2d 562, 296 Ill. Dec. 5 (2nd dist. 2005) Unsolicited fax transmissions violated right of privacy covered by advertising injury liability insurance.
  • Valley Forge Insurance Company v. Swiderski Electronics, Inc.
    Advertising Injury Liability Insurance
    223 Ill.2d 352, 860 N.E.2d 307, 307 Ill. Dec. 653 (2006) Fax blasting may be covered as "advertising injury" under a commercial liability policy.
  • Valor Insurance Company v. Torres
    Permissive User: In General
    303 Ill.App.3d 554, 708 N.E.2d 566, 236 Ill. Dec. 980 (2nd dist. 1999) Insured effectively revoked permission for use of vehicle by permissive user by expressly prohibiting additional driving of the vehicle.
  • Valor Insurance Company v. Wallace
    Cancellation: Notice Of
    309 Ill.App.3d 65, 722 N.E.2d 714, 242 Ill. Dec. 930 (1st dist. 2nd div. 1999) Insurer must strictly comply with statutory mailing requirements in order to effectively cancel policy.
  • Vanek v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Company
    Underinsured Motorist Coverage: Other Insurance
    268 Ill.App.3d 731, 644 N.E.2d 419, 205 Ill. Dec. 863 (2nd dist. 1994) UIM in auto policy not applicable to owned motorcycle.

Clear