Complete List - Insurance Case Law Index

Found 2,202 results

• United States Gypsum Company v. Admiral Insurance Company
  
  Choice Of Law
  268 Ill.App.3d 598, 643 N.E.2d 1226, 205 Ill. Dec. 619 (1st dist. 5th div. 1994) Most significant contacts test applied dependent on where action filed, where plaintiff domiciled and where injury occurred.
• United States Gypsum Company v. Admiral Insurance Company
  
  Primary V. Excess Insurance
  268 Ill.App.3d 598, 643 N.E.2d 1226, 205 Ill. Dec. 619 (1st dist. 5th div. 1994) All available primary insurance must be exhausted before excess coverage triggered.
• United States Gypsum Company v. Admiral Insurance Company
  
  Trigger Of Coverage
  268 Ill.App.3d 598, 643 N.E.2d 1226, 205 Ill. Dec. 619 (1st dist. 5th div. 1994) Injury-in-fact trigger adopted.
• United Stationers Supply Company v. Zurich American Insurance Company
  
  Certificate Of Insurance
  386 Ill.App.3d 88, 896 N.E.2d 425, 324 Ill. Dec. 639 (1st dist. 3rd div. 2008) The Court followed the line of Illinois cases holding that, where the certificate of insurance refers to the policy and expressly disclaims any coverage other than that contained in the policy, the policy should govern the extent and terms of the coverage.
• Universal Casualty Company v. Lopez
  
  Rescission
  376 Ill.App.3d 459, 876 N.E.2d 273, 315 Ill. Dec. 273 (1st dist. 5th div. 2007) No valid claim existed for material misrepresentation when insured failed to allege that undisclosed drivers lived with insured when applications were executed.
• Universal Underwriters Group v. Pierson
  
  Subrogation: In General
  337 Ill.App.3d 893, 787 N.E.2d 296, 337 Ill. Dec. 893 (1st dist. 1st div. 2003) Auto dealer’s insurer can subrogate against dealer’s customer to recover damages to dealer’s vehicle.
• Universal Underwriters Group v. Pierson
  
  Mandatory Insurance
  337 Ill.App.3d 893, 787 N.E.2d 296, 337 Ill. Dec. 893 (1st dist. 1st div. 2003) Neither the policy language nor public policy required auto dealer’s policy to defend or indemnify customer for damages to the dealer’s car.
• Universal Underwriters Insurance Company v. LKQ Smart Parts, Inc.
  
  Spoliation
  Ill.App.3d , 963 N.E.2d 930, 357 Ill. Dec. 532 (1st dist. 5th div. 2011) Spoliation constituted loss of use of auto covered under garage inventory policy.
• Universal Underwriters Insurance Group v. Griffin
  
  Other Insurance
  287 Ill.App.3d 61, 677 N.E.2d 1321, 222 Ill. Dec. 522 (1st dist. 2nd div. 1997) Where an excess clause and an excess-escape clause are in conflict, a proration of liability by policy limits is appropriate.
• Universal Underwriters Insurance Group v. Griffin
  
  Mandatory Insurance
  287 Ill.App.3d 61, 677 N.E.2d 1321, 222 Ill. Dec. 522 (1st dist. 2nd div. 1997) Customer using a loaner car is an insured under the garage policy.